Preparation
This assessment is in two parts:
Part 1: Project Report.
This report should be succinct, substantive, and written for a hypothetical executive leadership team. It is not a lengthy academic paper.

Part 2: Project Report Presentation.

This presentation is an overview of the project, also intended for an executive leadership team.
Presentation Tools

You may use Kaltura Media or other technology of your choice for your audio recording.
If using Kaltura Media, refer to the Using Kaltura tutorial for directions on recording and uploading your video in the courseroom.

Requirements

Part 1: Project Report

Develop your data review project report. Use the Data Review Project Report Template, linked in the Resources of this unit. This template is different from the Data Review Project Proposal Template used in Assessment 2. Authoritative sources should be integrated into the Evidence-Based Recommendations and Conclusion sections of the report.
Provide a minimum of three visual data summaries (for example, pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, and process map), two evidence-based recommendations from the literature, and one new insight. Place these additions in your document under the headings: Data Display, Recommendations, and Conclusion.
Add, in an appendix, the balanced scorecard table that you have created in Assessment 2.
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the first five grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your project report addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Report and Presentation Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

Align a problem statement, performance indicators, and outcome measures with an organizational strategic need.

What additional information would strengthen the alignment and make it more explicit?
Summarize the key findings from a review of current and relevant authoritative literature.
Be concise and substantive. Provide sufficient information in the summary to adequately cover the selected topic.
Consider adding additional best practice sources to your initial review of the current literature.
Articulate the value of a project to an organization.
Consider a strategic systems perspective when contemplating value to the organization.
Express main points, assertions, and conclusions clearly and effectively.
Be sure you have evidence to support your conclusions.
Analyze performance data and trends.
Present your visual data displays, along with a concise analysis.

Describe the significant findings, trends, and any new insights evident from the data summaries.

Determine if there are any limitations to your findings, obstacles to collection or interpretation of data, or potential for bias.

Ensure your data is valid and reliable.
Provide evidence-based recommendations, a conclusion for problem resolution, and organizational transformation.

Identify a short list of interventions to solve the problem, supported by current (published within the past 3–5 years) authoritative literature.

Consider how legal, regulatory, ethical, patient safety, and organizational factors are related to the problem.
Make realistic recommendations that are within the organization’s capability. They should not be based upon uncertain funding sources such as government grants, which might be discontinued.
Make your recommendations sufficiently compelling to convince the target audience to implement them.

Include, more importantly, a clear statement about how the project added value to the organization and aligned with the organization’s strategic direction and goals.

Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature.
Apply correct APA formatting to your source citations.
Consider how or why a particular piece of evidence supports your main points, claims, or conclusions.
Make sure your supporting evidence is clear and explicit.

PART 2: PROJECT REPORT PRESENTATION

Provide a concise overview of your project in a recorded slide presentation. Use the Data Review Project Report Presentation Template, linked in the Resources of this unit.
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the sixth grading criterion in the scoring guide. Be sure your presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Report and Presentation Scoring Guide to better understand how the following criterion will be assessed.
Present a concise, substantive project overview to decision makers.
Be clear and focused on your presentation.
Address the anticipated needs and concerns of your audience.

Apply best practices to the design and development of your presentation materials.

Support your main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.
Be sure to format citations and references using APA style.Data Review Project Report
Title of Project
Capella University MHA5020
Learner Name
Date
Instructor Name
Title of Project
• Statement of the Problem.
• Factors Examined and Units of Measurement.
• Summary of Literature Key Findings.
• Presentation of Data.
• Analysis of Data.
• Evidence-Based Recommendations.
• Conclusion.
• References.
Statement of the Problem
Factors Examined and Units of Measurement
Summary of Literature: Key Findings
Presentation of Data (1)
Presentation of Data (2)
Analysis of Data
Evidence Based Recommendations
Conclusion
References
Data Review Project Report Template
Your Data Review Project Report should include the following elements:
Cover Page: Include the project topic, the course title, your name, the date, the instructor’s
name, the client organization, and the contact person to whom the report is submitted.
Table of Contents: Include all headings, sub-headings, a list of figures and tables, a list of
appendices, and right-justified page numbers.
Executive Summary: 1–2 pages, double-spaced, with the title Executive Summary: [Final
project title]. Include the explicit, succinct purpose, focus of the project, the rationale for the
project, the method to examine the data (data review), metrics for performance measurement,
and a specific outcomes data summary statement. It is important that your executive summary
reflects how the project added value to the organization.
Abstract: 500 words or less.
Introductory paragraph: Clearly convey the purpose and focus of the project, the order in
which topics will be introduced, and a transition sentence to the body of the document. [Identify
the condition that] contributes to [identify the adverse consequence] (source, year).
Review of the literature: Identify the authoritative sources used to justify the purpose and
focus of your data review, summarized in short statements, with citations.
Body of the data review: Use headings and sub-headings, which should also be reflected in
the table of contents. Customize the following examples of suggested content areas according
to your project:

Focus.

Situational analysis: State the context for the project. What are the organizational
considerations and context?

Rationale for engaging in the project.

Description of data measured for the project.
o
Method or framework utilized.
o
Units used to measure data. These must be explicitly stated, precise, and easy to
locate.
o
At least three visual data summaries displayed in charts, graphs, tables, or any other
format, with an accompanying discussion.

Analysis of data and rationale for your interpretation. Are there limitations to your
findings, obstacles to collection or interpretation of data, or potential for bias?

Analyze the validity and reliability of your data.
Recommendations for the future: Provide a minimum of two evidence-based
recommendations supported by current (within the past 3–5 years) authoritative literature. Your
recommendations should be realistic, within the organization’s capability, and should not be based
upon uncertain funding sources, such as government grants, which might be discontinued.
1
Conclusion: Present your results and findings, recommendations, and leadership insights.
Most importantly, your conclusion should include a clear statement about how the project added
value to and was aligned with the organization.
Reference List: List relevant, credible, peer-reviewed sources in correct APA format. All links
for web resources must be active (working). Wikipedia and secondary source literature are not
acceptable for this report.
Appendices: Each appendix should have a letter and a title, as in this example, “Appendix A:
Situational Analysis Using Porter’s Model.”
Note: Add, in an appendix, the balanced scorecard table that you had created in Assessment 2.
Signatures:
____________________________________________________________________________
Proposal Reviewer’s Signature and Date
____________________________________________________________________________
Learner’s Signature and Date
2

Purchase answer to see full
attachment




Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.