As always, be sure to include paraphrased citations from the required readings, lectures, and videos.(article) “Racial, gender wage gaps persist in U.S. despite some progress”- https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/01/r… Ted Talk “how to make work-life balance work” – https://www.ted.com/talks/nigel_marsh_how_to_make_…There’s More to the Shrinking Pay Gap VideoWe have made it to our final week of group discussions! This week we
are studying both workplace diversity and work/life balance. I often
find the term “work/life balance” to be peculiar, since working is part of anyone’s life who is employed. Some of us even spend more time with our co-workers than we do with other people in our lives! Thinking about this week’s materials, let’s discuss how we balance
our working lives with the rest of our time. Here are some questions to
ponder this week. (You do not need to answer all of these questions;
they are just to get you thinking about the topic.)1. How do your roles and intersections of such characteristics as race,
gender, class, and the like play into your own balancing act? Use
examples from your life or the experiences of others you know to discuss
the concepts from Volti, the inequalities and diversity lecture, and
the TED Talks this week.2. Overwork, lack of paid vacation time, and inequalities in the
workplace are just a few issues in the U.S. workplace. Thinking about
those or other issues, how might we go about making positive changes for
workers? How might things need to change in the future?3. Discuss your ideas on workplace diversity and opportunities for change to the workplace structure.Chapter 13
Diversity in the Workplace
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Race, Ethnicity and Hiring
Historically, ascribed characteristics
prominent in hiring
Racial and ethnic discrimination
 One early example “Irish need not apply”
 Apprenticeships largely limited to white males
Not so overt anymore, but influence persists
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Barriers to Integration
Minorities lack incorporation into job networks
Location
 Minority groups often concentrated in urban
centers
 Economic bases have been “hollowed out”
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Barriers to Integration (continued)
Deindustrialization
 Inner-city enterprises diminishing
 Many firms have simply gone out of business
 Jobs gone abroad
 Neighborhood relocation from “undesirable” areas
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Barriers to Integration (continued)
Spatial Mismatches
 Minorities reside in certain areas; jobs in
another (e.g., Suburbs)
 Transportation difficult
 Lack of access to suburban social networks
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Barriers to Integration (continued)
 Unemployment percentages (2008)
 Whites: women 8.5, men 10.3
 African Americans: women 13.2, men 19.9
 Latinos: women 11.9, men 12.9
 Asian Americans: women 7.3, men 6.6
 Even well-qualified minority workers may be
subject to prejudice
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Prejudice and Discrimination
Few employers exhibit blatant discrimination
Unintentional mechanisms:
 Educational requirements
 The intersection of hiring and education
 Skill requirements
 “Hard” versus “Soft” skills
 Emphasis on the latter problematic for some
minorities
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Prejudice and Discrimination
(continued)
Employers not the only ones who have
discriminated
 For example: Labor Unions
 Against African American
 The “Yellow Peril” among Chinese workers
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Prejudice and Discrimination
(continued)
Discrimination without personal prejudice
White clientele may not accept minority
workers
“Reverse discrimination”
Reluctant to hire whites for “minority jobs”
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Women in the Workforce
Women have entered the labor force in large
numbers in recent decades
 This largely due to white women entering
 African American women have historically
worked in large numbers
But jobs held differ substantially from men
 Over-representation among secretaries, nurses
and cashiers
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Gender-based Occupational
Segregation
One explanation: gender segregation grounded
in biology
 Here, men and women’s jobs reflect innate skills
and abilities
 As a result, women work as teachers; men as
mechanics
 The notion that women are “homemakers” first
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Gender-based Occupational
Segregation (continued)
Segregation grounded in motivations and
actions of women
 Child care and family emphasizeded
 Women self-select into jobs allowing
flexibility
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Gender-based Occupational
Segregation (continued)
Related approach: Human Capital
 Women said to be unwilling to invest in
education and training
 Primary commitments to family
 Employers unwilling to hire for the same
reason
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Gender-based Occupational
Segregation (continued)
Segregation grounded in social
psychology
 Boys and girls socialized differently
 Thus leading to the development of
different skills and abilities
 As adults, they gravitate towards different
jobs given their history
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Limitations of the Above
Explanations
Biological explanations:
 Division of labor historical (e.g., HunterGatherers)
 But new jobs are 80% service-based and
“masculine” virtues matter less
Balancing work and family:
 “Women’s” jobs more accommodating
 But single women as likely to hold them
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Limitations of the Above
Explanations (continued)
Human capital:
 More difficult to assess
 Helps explain lack of representation at the top, but
not simply due to insufficient human capital
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Limitations of the Above
Explanations (continued)
Socialization experiences:
 Again, assessment difficult
 Occupational changes from the 1960s onward
despite women having been socialized in the
1950s
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Discrimination, Segregation and
Pay
Substantial differences in remuneration tied to
race, ethnicity and gender
Several notable reasons:
 Historically higher unemployment for minority
groups
 Less seniority of minority members
 Ineffectiveness and hostility surrounding
Affirmative Action
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Discrimination, Segregation and
Pay (continued)
Gender-based differentials also evident
 Women make $.80 for each dollar earned by men
(2008)
 Find both discrimination and exclusion
Reasons for lower pay for women:
 Work less hours per year on average
 Education and job experience
 Gender discrimination
 Gender-based occupational segregation
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Discrimination, Segregation and
Pay (continued)
 Effects of supply and demand for “women’s
jobs”:
 Supply is large; demand is low
 Devaluation of women’s work
 Continuity of careers
 Women have more breaks in career trajectories
 Child bearing, raising children come at a critical
point
 Motherhood entails more for women, even though
they stay at work
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Intersection of Race and Gender
African American and Latino women earn
less than white women
But having a college degree reverses this
 African American women with college degrees
earn slightly more than white women with
degrees
 Longer careers
 Also, perhaps less discrimination than faced by
black men
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Summing Up
Women earn on average less than men
Over the long term, the male-female earnings
gap has narrowed
 Men’s wages declined; women’s wages did not
increase substantially
For college-educated women, news is mixed:
 Have seen improved pay
 But the male-female gap has increased
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Getting Ahead
Primary mechanism for getting ahead is
promotion
 Seniority or merit?
Promotion on seniority unambiguous
 Often dictates wages, salaries and shifts
 Often in labor contracts
 Helps to prevent prejudiced decisions
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Getting Ahead (continued)
Promotion by merit appeals to a sense of
fairness
 Used by employers for motivation
 But is often ambiguous:
 How does one define merit?
 May occupations have multiple work tasks and
components
 Most jobs are collective in nature
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Problems for Women and
Minorities
Seniority rewards stable employment to the
advantage of white men
Pitfalls of merit:
 Always a subjective element
 Cooperation is key, but problematic
Kanter (1977)
 “Homosocial Reproduction”
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Legal Remedies
Until the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964,
restraints to racial, ethnic, and gender
discrimination were confined to state and local
laws.
Enactment and enforcement did not transform
the workplace
One remedy: Affirmative Action
 Justification – past discrimination has produced
serious inequalities that need specific policies to
address
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Interpreting Affirmative Action
Difficulties emerge in policy
One approach to affirmative action:
 Create fairer chances in applying for
educational opportunities and jobs
Another approach to affirmative action
 Widening access to education and jobs will not
solve the problem
 A call for quotas
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Interpreting Affirmative Action
(continued)
A third approach to affirmative action
 Widening the applicant pool will not substantially
change hiring practices
 But targeted educational and training programs
will improve prospects for minorities
The history of inequalities based on race,
ethnicity, and gender is a long one, and is
unlikely to be remedied in a short time.
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Comparable Worth Policies
“Comparable Worth” suggests gender
segregation should not result in unequal pay
 Jobs may be male or female-dominated
 But fundamentally similar
 Training
 Job-related experience
 Mental, physical stress
 Workplace responsibilities
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Comparable Worth Policies
(continued)
State and local level proposals suggested
But overall have gained little traction
Nationally, political and economic barriers
persist
 Politically, it stands in opposition to a “freemarket” wage system
 But it is clear that markets are not the sole
determinant of wages and salaries
 Selection of criteria for job evaluation
contentious
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Chapter 14
Work Roles and Life Roles
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Separation of Work and
Residence
 Commuting now a way of life
 Historically, a new phenomenon
 Hunter-gatherers lived where food was available
 Agriculture linked work and residence
 Urbanization/industrialization had little impact at
first
 Cities were dense and compact, workers were
within walking distance of their jobs
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Separation of Work and
Residence
 Commuting longer distances not possible until
the latter 19th century
 Initially, “public transit” meant horse-drawn
buses and streetcars
 Trolleys, subways, and elevated railroads
allowed longer commuting distances
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Separation of Work and
Residence
 In the 1920s, the automobile became the vehicle of
choice
 Since then, work and residence continue to
separate
 But commuting time is significant
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Working Hours
 Time spent at our jobs has becime a significant
issue
 Many feel the pressure of a “time bind”
 Pressures from competing sources
 Increase in time spent at work a reversal of
historical trend
 A future with more leisure time was expected in
the 1950s.
 Idleness the concern; not overwork
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Working Hours
 The “Overworked American” (Schor)
 The average number of hours grew from the
1970s onward
 Most attributed to managerial motivations and
actions
 Growing numbers of salaried workers meant
that remuneration did not do up with the
number of hours worked
 Health insurance and pensions based on the
number of employees, not the number of hours
that they worked
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Working Hours
 Employees accepted and even embraced a culture
of over-work
 Unions and industries lost interest in reducing
hours
 May have reflected economic realities
 Compensation stagnated
 Material desires increased
 “Cycle of work and spend” (Schor)
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Working Hours
 Disagreement as to how many hours people are
spending on the job
 Bottom line: effective measurement
 How measurements are made
 What is measured
 Whose work is measured
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
How Measurement is Taken
 Measurement taken from 2 sources:
 Current Population Survey (CPS)
 Random sample of 60,000
 Time Diaries
 Survey Research Center, Universities of
Michigan and Maryland
 Convergence:
 Divergence appears as random errors
 All things considered, both sets appear to agree
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
What and Who is Measured
 Contradictory results have emerged from failure
to distinguish annual versus weekly hours worked
 Estimates speak to the “average” American
worker
 Only a statistical entity
 Necessary to distinguish categories of workers
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
The Role of Gender
 Men and women exhibit significant differences:
 Women work fewer hours on average
 But hours have been moving upward, whereas
men’s hours remain stable
 Women’s participation has become less episodic
 Here, overall increases due to increased hours
worked by women
 Not sheer number of hours put in by all workers
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Segmenting the Labor Force
 Age differences:
 Those aged 25-55 put in the most hours
 Kind of work:
 Mangers, sales and professionals have longer
hours
 Skilled blue collar workers with fewer hours
 Education:
 More education leads to more hours
 In part due to demanding jobs
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Work Hours
 US workers put in more hours annually than
workers other industrialized countries:
 Japan, European nations
 Vacation days:
 Italians = 42
 French = 37
 Germans = 32
 Americans = 13
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Work Hours
 In the US, time away from the workplace does not
mean time away from work
 Many workers take work home with them
 Made possible by modern communications
technologies
 Internet
 Email
 Being at work does not necessarily mean being
productive
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Women at Work
 Women have historically worked
 Initially largely confined to the home
 Textile industries began to employ young women
in the 18th and 19th centuries
 Married women worked in the least industrialized
sectors
 Expansion of clerical work and teaching changed
this pattern
 Women worked prior to marriage
 Or once children were self-sufficient
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Women at Work
 Both world wars significantly increased women’s
employment opportunities
 Cessation of hostilities produced short-term
drops
 Other factors affecting women’s workforce
participation:
 End of the baby boom
 Rise of the service sector
 Rise of a “consumer society”
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
The Second Shift
 For many women, working for pay means they
hold 2 jobs
 A job for a wage
 Domestic work at home
 The hours of women’s domestic duties stable for
much of the 20th century
 Changed somewhat in recent years
 Employed women spending 2/3 the time at
home as women not in the labor force
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
The Second Shift
 The ratio of housework shifting towards women
 Men have increased contributions
 But mostly women doing less
 A clear gender division of housework
 Women: cooking, cleaning, child care
 Men: home repairs, yard work, auto
maintenance
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
The Second Shift
 Technology has both helped and hindered
 Appliances have elevated expectations
 Meals expected to be appetizing and
healthful
 Clothes need always be clean
 More driving time
 Also shifted responsibility for some household
tasks away from men
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Couples, Careers and Families
 In a majority of US households, men and women
hold paying jobs
 The number of hours worker per couple has
increased
 1975 – 52.5 hours per week
 2000 – 63.1 hours per week
 The number of couples putting in longer hours
has increased
 Especially among the childless
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Couples, Families and Careers
 Dual-earner families enjoy higher incomes along
with other benefits, such as Socializing in the
workplace
Along with benefits come stresses
 Wives devote more time to housework and
child care
 Men continue to work long hours, even in
families with large numbers of children
 Long hours not easily reconciled with family
responsibilities
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Couples, Families and Careers
 Careers often proceed in stages and are more
demanding than ordinary jobs
 Hence, potentially more stress
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Couples, Families and Careers
 Careers may require frequent moves, which create
certain problems
 Leaving established networks
 Problems of the “trailing spouse”
 Abandoning a present position and finding
another
 Male-female differences
 Women less likely to move
 Men’s careers often valued more than those
of women
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Couples, Families and Careers
 Some couples maintain 2 residences
 May be necessary if both spouses are pursuing
careers
 Long distance marriages inherently difficult
 Some careers call for spouses to remain together
 “Two-person” careers
 Example: wives of executives
 Much less common today
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Reconciling Work and Life Roles
 “Balance” suggests an equilibrium
 Not a likely situation for work and family
 Specific policies would allow an easier
reconciliation of work and family roles.
 Reducing hours at work
 In the first half of the 19th century, some trades
successful
 8-hour work day
 Limitations for women and children
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Reconciling Work and Life Roles
 Fair Labor Standards Act, 1938
 Federal backing of the 8-hour day
 In years following, paid vacations emerged
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Reconciling Work and Life Roles
 Long term reduction gave workers added time, but
this trend has stalled in recent years
 Child care time among women has remained
stable
 Likely to be a major source of stress for full-time
women workers
 On-site child care only offered by a few
employers
 But about half offer some assistance
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Flexible Work Scheduling
 No way to expand the number of hours per day,
but demands can be made manageable
 Flexibility in scheduling
 May be preferred to fewer hours, but rigid
scheduling
 Fixed scheduling problematic as it does not match
other demands
 School schedules
 Child illnesses
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Flexible Work Scheduling
 One solution: part-time work arrangements
 May not be economically feasible
 May retard careers
 Another possibility: shift work
 Example: the “graveyard shift” (11 PM to 7 AM)
 Allowing 10 hours over 4 days
 Despite drawbacks, these strategies are popular
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Flexible Work Scheduling
 Flexible arrangements not evenly distributed
 Women at the high end have less workplace
flexibility than men
 Appears greatest for those who work both
longer and shorter weeks on average
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Flexible Work Scheduling
 Flexible work arrangements can alleviate stress
 Positively enhance job satisfaction
 Increased commitment and desire to remain
employed
 Improved morale may lead to greater
productivity
 Parents may still miss critical family episodes
 Birth or adoption
 Full-time child rearing for extended periods
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Work and Parenting
 Parents get no direct financial support from the
federal government
 Tax deductions are often significant
 Some states cover maternity leave as part of
disability insurance
 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act
 Illegal to fire or not hire women on the basis of
pregnancy
 1993 Medical Leave Act
 Easier to attend to parental obligations
 But only among firms with 50 or more employees
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012
Work and Parenting
 Given the restrictions, many parents stay on the job
after the birth of adoption of a child
 Only about 50% take leave
 Mostly women, but men may also take leave time
 Reflects traditional gender roles
 Reflect gender-based wage gap
 Some workers covered by employer’s leave
programs
 But most likely found among well-paid, skilled
employees
© Pine Forge Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012

Purchase answer to see full
attachment




Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.